Then only possible if both settlements are of the same tier and you are military allies. I was thinking about this yesterday, I think it could only really work as a trade, settlement for settlement. This is the biggest reason why I oppose such ideas- they actually add nothing to the game since the brains that would make them work in the first place, are not there,
BUILDING SETTLEMENT MARKER INSTALLATION DEFINITION FULL
I mean, short of building up an entire province and then gifting it all to an aggressive faction, you're actually doing nothing if you just gave regions to a faction, because they'd either fail to make full use of the regions, or just lose them when Beastmen, Chaos or their enemies roll around. It actually kind of ruined gameplay.Īs far as I am concerned, like so many ideas people want with Total War, ideas like these won't work simply because the AI wouldn't response to them well. In the past, region trading and gifting was very cheesy, since the AI wouldn't really do anything with it.
Build in some kind of limit with a faction so this isn't abused to just keep taking territory without fighting, but negotiations over one settlement to complete a province without all-out war should be a diplomatic option. The ability to exchange settlements would be really nice for these situationsġ) Some times you are missing one settlement of a province owned by your ally and don't want to war over it.Ģ) You want to gift territory to an ally a settlement that is worthless to your faction, but could gain you favorģ) You could threaten war to gain territory to a weaker faction that doesn't want war with you. 2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia.
846 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.
0 kommentar(er)
